黑警濫權實錄10038:肆意施暴

編者:陳妍茵

2020-03-30(濫權紀錄)

所屬分類: 黑警濫權實錄
本紀錄由NOPAID ("Netizens Organizing Police Abuse Investigation Data") 團隊整合而成,以 CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 授權轉載。
Post Topic Image

詳細資料

事件編號 201910038
來源 眾新聞 Citizens News
網絡連結 https://youtu.be/iAtVlpE1CBg
日期及時間 2019-10-27
警察行徑 違反警方使用武力原則

警方催淚彈射進一間位於九龍旺角彌敦道近登打士街之藥房,急救員衝入救人。

最後更新:2020-03-30

相關資料

黑警濫權實錄08054:肆意施暴

濫權紀錄

以警棍攻擊毫無保護裝備,路過散步的市民頭部,涉嫌違反《公安條例》第17條中,表明警務人員在阻止公眾聚集舉行,或停止或解散公眾聚集時,只可以使用「合理所需的武力」。而過份武力對待被拘捕人士,在沒有合理辨解下,亦可能違反《侵害人身罪條例》各條。

黑警濫權實錄08002:肆意施暴、阻撓採訪、不禮貌

濫權紀錄

警方進入雅景臺私人屋苑,未有展示有效的搜查令或相關文件下,擅闖私人屋苑搜捕,涉嫌違反警察通例 (44-04),警務人員如未獲得合法授權或擁有人╱佔用人的同意,不得進入任何處所搜查。當居民提出反對,警方對市民粗言穢語及恐嚇市民,一名住戶表示並未有任何肢體接觸下,警方恐嚇他干犯襲警罪名,一名白衫警員在住宿大樓的大門內與市民推撞,門外另有多名警員推拉大門警察推開居民,在沒有合理辨解下,亦可能違反《侵害人身罪條例》各條。以強光及白光照向記者,亦涉嫌違反警察通例 (39-05),警務人員應盡可能協助新聞媒體工作者的採訪工作。

黑警濫權實錄10005:肆意施暴

濫權紀錄

以下為相關新聞節錄:【十一荃灣開槍完整片段】無警示近距離開槍 延誤救治至少三分鐘較早前盧偉聰召開記者會,回應於十月一日荃灣示威中,有警員近距離槍擊示威者心口事件。他聲稱「警員曾警告但無效,生命受嚴重威脅,逼於無奈使用佩槍,制止暴力襲擊,做法合法及合理。」他又聲稱在場警員隨即為傷者止血及施救。本台記者從另一角度拍攝到事發經過,發現與警方描述有所出入。盧偉聰於記者會聲稱警員曾向示威者警告但無效,而警員感到生命受嚴重威脅,逼於無奈使用佩槍。然而,片段顯示警員舉槍時先指向前方示威者頭部,然後指向右方的示威者於不足一米的距離內向左胸開槍,整個過程不足一秒,並未有向在場市民作任何警示。盧又聲稱有人向受傷倒地的傷者及警員投擲汽油彈。然而錄影片段中只有一枚汽油彈於警員位置五米外落地,而在場警員亦無為中槍倒地的傷者進行保護或急救,只站在一旁及制服一名示威者,期間該警員更聲稱:「First-aid 我都有啦」。盧又聲稱在場警員隨即為傷者止血及施救,但片段中顯示傷者中槍倒地後至少三分鐘,除了正在制服示威者的警員外,在旁六位警員仍沒有施救,期間中槍者多次高喊「救命」,惟警員仍沒有理會,直至三分鐘後方有警員低頭查看傷者。片段亦顯示中槍後至少五分鐘,仍未有警方急救員到場施救。Earlier, Commission of Police, Stephen Lo responded in a press release that an officer fired point blank at a protester in the 1st of October protest. Lo claimed, "the officer had warned the protesters but to no avail and he had felt that his life was in grave danger. He had no choice but to stop violence with his gun, all is legal and legitimate." He also claimed that the officers IMMEDIATELY treated the victim's wounds to save him. Our reporters recorded the incident from a different angle, which seems to speak differently of these claims. First, Commission Lo argues that the protesters had not heeded the police's warnings, causing the officer to "feel that he was in grave danger" and needed to use his gun. However, footage shows that the officer first points his gun to protester's head in front of him, then to his right, firing at a protester in less than 1 meter. This transition lasted less than a second, making it impossible for any 'warning' to have been issued. Second, Lo argues that someone had thrown a petrol bomb at the fallen protesters and police. However, footage reveals that there had only been one such object thrown, falling onto somewhere 5 meters away from them. No police officers could be seen doing anything for the protester shot at all, but were busy subduing another protester or just watching. Also, Lo argued that the police had IMMEDIATELY treated his wounds, but footage reveals that the shot protester was left on the ground for AT LEAST 3 minutes completely ignored. The shot protester was screaming "SAVE ME", yet the police officer had stayed clear away from him. Only after 3 minutes had there been an officer checking on him. For well over 5 minutes, no police officer could be seen treating his wounds.